Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sahaban AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond, sureties, and surrender conditions under Section 482(2).

Summary

The petitioner, Sahaban Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 relating to a land dispute in which he was alleged to have assaulted the informant. The petitioner asserted a clean record and claimed the allegations were false, noting that the injuries to the informant did not correspond to his alleged actions. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The court examined the medical report, noting that the injuries were either mild or not attributable to the petitioner, and considered his willingness to cooperate. Relying on Section 482(2) of the CrPC, the court granted anticipatory bail with a bond of Rs.25,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions and a six‑week surrender period.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the offences listed in the B.N.S., 2023.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged injuries and the petitioner’s background justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner is likely to abscond or tamper with evidence if bail is denied.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal law
  • section 482
  • B.N.S. offences
  • land dispute
  • injury assessment
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86256 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2025 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Sahaban Ansari S/O Late Dillu Ansari R/O Village - Anhari, P.S- Kochas,
                 Dist.- Rohtas

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered

                   for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2),

                   115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2) and 352 of B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

                   alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, accused

                   persons including the petitioner came and assaulted him by

                   spade causing injury on head and rest of the accused assaulted

                   by lathi, danda causing fracture of right hand.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

                   informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the injury
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86256 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026
                                            2/3




          report, annexed as Annexure-2, it would manifest that the

          informant received three injuries out of which injury no.2,

          which is pain and swelling over right shoulder, has been opined

          to be grievous in nature but then petitioner is not alleged to have

          assaulted the informant on his shoulder. It is next submitted that

          as far as injury no.1, i.e., injury on head is concerned, the same

          has been opined to be mild grievous. It is also submitted that

          petitioner is not a criminal and on account of dispute relating to

          land, both sides assaulted each other and even the side of the

          petitioner also suffered injury. It is further submitted that

          petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the

          investigation to prove his innocence.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts

          that injury no.1 has been opined to be mild grievous, petitioner

          is not a criminal and on account of dispute relating to land, the

          occurrence is alleged to have taken place, let petitioner, above-

          named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned

          trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released

          on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/-
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86256 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                         amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

                         the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Kochas

                         P.S. Case No.161 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

                         under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.