Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Arvind Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the Court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that withdrawal was appropriate given the arrest. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner can withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86352 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2024 Thana- Mabby District- Darbhanga
                  ======================================================
                  Arvind Kumar S/o Ramkeshwar Singh @ Ram Keshar Singh R/o Village -
                  Fatehpurwala, P.S - Musarigharari, District - Samastipur

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ajay Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    08-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner during pendency of the same was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.