Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aasmin KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that anticipatory bail may be granted to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Summary

Petitioners Aasmin Khatoon and Md. Arman, wife and brother of accused Md. Tanvir, feared arrest in a case alleging assault on police officers and related offences under several IPC sections. They claimed they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an informant, noting that Md. Tanvir had already been granted anticipatory bail. The State opposed granting bail to the petitioners. The High Court, after hearing counsel, ordered that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail if arrested or surrendered within six weeks, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC. The order was made to prevent unnecessary incarceration given the circumstances.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the serious offences alleged against them.
  • Whether the prior grant of anticipatory bail to Md. Tanvir negates the need for bail to the petitioners.
  • Whether the petitioners have been falsely implicated and thus merit relief from arrest.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • false implication
  • police assault
  • high court inherent powers

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86413 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2023 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Aasmin Khatoon W/O Mohammad Tanvir Resident of Village-
                  Sharfuddinpur, Ward No.09, P.S.- Bochhan, District- Muzaffarpur.
           2.    Md. Arman S/O Md. Jubair @ Md. Zubair Resident of Village-
                 Sharfuddinpur, Ward No.09, P.S.- Bochhan, District- Muzaffarpur.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342,

                   323, 324, 307, 353, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.1

                   is a woman and the informant alleges that he along with other

                   police officials in the intervening night 06.02.2023 at around

                   01:15 a.m. went to the house of Md. Tanvir, who was wanted in

                   Bochahan P.S. Case No.447 of 2022. It is next alleged that Md.

                   Tanvir was arrested when accused persons including the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86413 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners surrounded the police team and assaulted the police

          officials and set free the apprehended accused, Md. Tanvir.

          Further, in the occurrence, one lady constable, namely, Soni

          Kumari got injured.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

          the informant as petitioner no.1 is wife of Md. Tanvir and

          petitioner no.2 is brother of Md. Tanvir.. It is next submitted that

          Md. Tanvir was granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by an

          order dated 12.01.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.84591 of 2023 passed

          by a learned Coordinate Bench. It is thus, submitted that since

          Md. Tanvir has already been granted the privilege of

          anticipatory bail, no useful purpose would be served by sending

          the petitioners to jail.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the

          event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court

          within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

          anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86413 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

                         the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with

                         Bochahan P.S. Case No.62 of 2023, subject to the conditions as

                         laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.