Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kalu Singh @ Sanatan Kumar @ Kailu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.

Summary

The petitioner, Kalu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 448, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and Arms Act section 27. The informant alleged that the accused, on orders of Ramanand Singh, fired at his son, but the petitioner argued that the injury report showed no firearm injury and that he was falsely implicated. The petitioner also highlighted that a co‑accused, Ramashray Kumar, had previously been granted anticipatory bail in a related matter. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the pending criminal case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • false implication
  • IPC offences
  • Arms Act
  • CrPC Section 482
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86729 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2024 Thana- PIPRIYA District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Kalu Singh @ Sanatan Kumar @ Kailu Singh Son of Babloo Singh @
                 Mritunjaya Kumar R/o Village and Post- Wallipur, P.S.- Piparia, District-
                 Lakhisarai
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned APP for the State, Mr. Rabindra Kumar.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 448,

                   341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code as well as

                   under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and

                   the informant alleges that accused persons came inside his

                   house and on orders of Ramanand Singh, the named accused

                   persons fired causing firearm injury to his son, further,

                   Dharmraj Singh and Ramashray also fired at the informant but

                   missed.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits

                   that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant case by
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86729 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the informant. It is next submitted that no doubt in the FIR, it is

                      alleged that accused persons fired causing firearm injury to his

                      son, but then from perusal of the injury report of the son of the

                      informant, it would manifest that no firearm injury was caused

                      to him. It is further submitted that Ramashray Kumar had

                      approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing

                      Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40515 2025 and the same came to

                      be allowed by an order dated 02.09.2025.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                      anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the submissions made by learned

                      counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above-named, in the

                      event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks

                      from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

                      of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

                      court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection

                      with Pipariya P.S. Case No. 49 of 2024, subject to the conditions

                      as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.


                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Rishabh/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.