Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhola Kumar @ Bhola YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the circumstances did not warrant continued detention.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhola Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Ariyari P.S. Case No. 225 of 2023) alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, along with co‑accused, brutally assaulted and killed the husband of an informant. Kumar’s counsel argued that he was not present at the scene, no incriminating material was found in his possession, and the allegations were vague; he also pointed to his three prior antecedents for which he was on bail. The State opposed the bail application, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges. Considering the lack of direct evidence, the petitioner’s custody period, and the fact that co‑accused had already been granted bail, the Court decided to grant bail on a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused person in a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 IPC when no direct incriminating material is found.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • IPC 302
  • IPC 34
  • criminal procedure
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86799 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2023 Thana- ARIYARI District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Bhola Kumar @ Bhola Yadav S/O Late Jagdish Yadav R/O village - Karihon,
                 P.S- Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ariyari

                   P.S. Case No. 225 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner

                   along with other co-accused persons have committed murder of

                   informant’s husband by assaulting him brutally.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

                   the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against

                   the petitioner is not specific rather the same is general and

                   omnibus in nature. The petitioner was not present at the place of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86799 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 11.09.2025 and

                     has got three criminal antecedents in which he is on bail.

                     Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-

                     accused have been granted regular bail by this Court vide order

                     dated 19.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36850 of 2025 and

                     vide order dated 10.10.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous

                     No. 69004 of 2025.

                                  5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case and taking into account the period of custody

                     undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail

                     to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No.

                     225 of 2023.


                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.