Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn at the petitioner’s request and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Rajesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court’s permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court granted the request and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. No substantive discussion on the merits of the bail was made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86944 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2025 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur
                  ======================================================
                  Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Singh S/O Dashrath Singh Resident of Village-
                  Rupbandh, Basavariya Mohan Tola, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur, Bihar

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nityanand, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    23-02-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.