Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Pre‑arrest bail was not granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, filed a pre‑arrest bail application in the Patna High Court in connection with a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, causing the informant's death. The FIR alleged direct involvement of the petitioner in the commission of the offence. The Court examined the seriousness of the charge of murder with common intention and the petitioner’s alleged participation. Considering the gravity of the allegations, the Court declined to grant pre‑arrest bail. However, the Court directed the petitioner to surrender before the District Court and seek regular bail, directing the lower court to consider the application promptly. The petition was consequently disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • IPC 302
  • IPC 34
  • murder
  • bail application
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87079 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2024 Thana- TURKI KHARARU District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Mandal Son of Sundar Mandal R/o Village - Bakarpur,
                 P.S. - Turki, Dist. - Muzaffarpur.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Pradeep Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sinha, learned counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Mohammad

                   Sufyan, learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Turki (Muzaffarpur) P.S. Case No. 69/24 registered for the

                   offence(s) punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                                3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner

                   is said to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod on

                   his head, as a result of which, he succumbed to injuries.

                                4. Considering the nature of allegation made in the

                   FIR and also the fact that there is direct involvement of the

                   petitioner in the commission of offence, I am not inclined to

                   grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87079 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  5. However,          the petitioner, if so advised, may

                     surrender before the learned District Court and seek regular bail.

                     In that case, the learned District Court is directed to consider the

                     bail application of the petitioner on the same day and pass

                     necessary order on the basis of material which has come in

                     course of investigation without delay.

                                  6. The present petition stands disposed of.



                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.