Vikky Kumar Yadav @ Vikky Kumar @ Vikki RoyversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87281 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-327 Year-2025 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Vikky Kumar Yadav @ Vikky Kumar @ Vikki Roy S/o Vinod Ray R/O-Vill.-
                 Chakki Gopalpur, Ward no.8, P.o- Chamtha, P.s-Bachwara,- District.
                 -Begusarai, Pincode-851111, Bihar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Rita Devi W/o Rambali Mahto R/o vill - Chakki Gopalpur, P.O.- Chamtha,
                 P.S.- Bachwara, Distt.- Begusarai

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Vishal Vikram Rana, Adv.
                                                  Ms. Misha Bharti, Adv.
                                                  Mr. Utkarsh Vikram Rana, Adv.
                                                  Mr. Kumar Saurav Dev, Adv.
                                                  Mr. Akash Priya, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Bachwara P.S. Case No. 327 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 64, 331(4), 303(2), 3(5) of

                   the B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the

                   petitioner entered in the house of the informant and committed

                   rape with her.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87281 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

          case. During the course of investigation, the victim has given

          her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the

          BNSS, wherein she has stated that the petitioner has entered her

          house. Her husband called her and told her that somebody has

          entered the house, but she did not find anyone. After that, her

          mother-in-law told her that the petitioner is on the Chajji. She

          found her there. After that, the mother-in-law of the victim

          closed the door from outside, and after that, the petitioner

          committed rape with her. In her statement recorded under

          Section 183 of the BNSS, the victim has stated that as the

          petitioner entered her house, somebody saw him and called her

          husband, who asked her as to who had entered, and then she

          said that nobody is there. After that, the husband of the

          informant called her mother-in-law. This goes to show that the

          victim herself has called him, and on being called by the family

          members, she has made out a case of rape. He further submits

          that from perusal of the medical examination report, it transpires

          that the doctor has not found any injury on any part of the

          victim. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial

          custody since 10.09.2025.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87281 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                     antecedent of two cases.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     J.M.F.C., Begusarai in connection with Bachwara P.S. Case No.

                     327 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T