Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raja Singh @ Ravi Ranjan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied because the nature of the offences and the petitioner’s extensive criminal antecedents warranted continued custody.

Summary

The petitioner, Raja Singh, was charged under Sections 121, 122, 103(1), 61(2) and 121(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly stabbing a deceased person. The FIR identifies him as one of the assailants and notes that he has six prior criminal convictions. He applied for bail, arguing that he had been in custody since 08‑08‑2025. The court examined the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s extensive criminal antecedent. Considering these factors, the court rejected the bail application but directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being charged with serious offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and having multiple prior convictions

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • serious offences
  • trial expeditious
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87440 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-734 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East
                                                          Champaran
                    ======================================================
                    Raja Singh @ Ravi Ranjan Singh S/o- Late Deepak Singh Mohalla-
                    Panchmandir Road, Near Rani Sati Teple, Baniyapatti, P.S. Town Motihari,
                    Dist- East Champaran
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                    The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Vinay Ranjan, Advocate
                    For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP
                                                    Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv.for Informant
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                          ORAL ORDER

2      30-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                      A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                      offence under Sections 121, 122, 103(1), 61(2), 121(1) of the

                      B.N.S., 2023.

                                   3. As per F.I.R., petitioner is one of the assailant of the

                      deceased and he is alleged to have stabbed in the stomach of the

                      deceased. Petitioner has got six criminal antecedent.

                                   4. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal

                      antecedent,        the prayer for bail of petitioner is rejected.

                      However, since petitioner is in custody since 08.08.2025, the

                      learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.