Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that a petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application, and accordingly dismissed the second application as withdrawn.

Summary

Satendra Kumar, the petitioner, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No.81 Year-2024) and filed a second anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw this second anticipatory bail application. The Court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the second anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders were made, and the matter was concluded on the basis of the withdrawal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application and have it dismissed as withdrawn

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87764 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2024 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada
                  ======================================================
                  Satendra Kumar Son of Anil Mahto Resident of Village- Manjaur, P.S.-
                  Warshaliganj, District- Nawada

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar, Adv.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    18-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset

                    seeks permission to withdraw the second anticipatory bail

                    application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The second anticipatory bail application of the

                    petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.