Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jai Ram ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Jai Ram Choudhary, was arrested after police recovered 19.75 litres of country-made liquor from a plastic jar he was carrying, and he was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was recovered from a public bamboo bush and that he had no conscious possession, and that the police had ulterior motives. The State opposed bail, while the petitioner’s counsel highlighted the lack of incriminating material and non‑compliance with Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. Considering the facts, the court found no compelling reason to keep the petitioner in custody and decided to grant bail. Bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close family member, and on the petitioner’s regular appearance in court.

Issues considered

  • What is the applicability of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act to the petitioner’s alleged possession of illicit liquor?
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite having five prior criminal antecedents and the alleged recovery of liquor from a public place.
  • Whether the prosecution complied with Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023 in the arrest and investigation.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 103 BNSS
  • criminal antecedents
  • police investigation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.878 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2025 Thana- ARIYARI District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Jai Ram Choudhary S/O Late Faggu Choudhary Resident of Vill- Baikathpur,
                 P.S- Ariyari, Dist- Sheikhpura.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Kumari Anupam, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                           2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ariyari PS

                   Case No. 147 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section

                   30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                           3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 19.750 liters of

                   country made liquor was recovered from the plastic jar carried

                   by the petitioner and the petitioner was arrested on the spot.

                           4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

                   no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.878 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          for the petitioner submits that the recovery has been made from

          the bamboo bush which is an open place accessible to public at

          large and petitioner is implicated in this case by the police with

          ulterior motive. The petitioner is in custody since 11.11.2025

          and has got five criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of

          Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.

                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

          the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner,

          this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing

          of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court

          in connection with Ariyari PS Case No. 147 of 2025, subject to

          the following conditions:

                  (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

          family of the petitioner.

                  (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

          consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.878 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Siddharth Soni/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.