Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chintu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Petitioners Chintu Singh and Rani Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged kidnapping of a girl on 13‑12‑2024. They contended they have clean antecedents, the FIR was lodged after an undue delay of eight days, and the alleged victim later gave a statement under Section 180 B.N.S.S. denying any abduction and stating she left home of her own accord. The State opposed the bail. The Court examined the delay, the victim’s statement and the lack of substantive evidence, and held that the petitioners could be released on anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. Bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each were ordered, pending surrender before the trial court within six weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the circumstances.
  • Whether the delay in filing the FIR and the victim's statement under Section 180 B.N.S.S. negate the grounds for arrest.
  • Whether the allegations constitute a false implication warranting bail.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 137(2), 180, 3(5), 482(2), 87

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • false implication
  • kidnapping allegation
  • delay in FIR
  • Section 180
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87827 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2024 Thana- Kadirganj P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.     Chintu Singh S/O Late Lakhan Singh Resident of Village- Jamuawa, P.S-
                  Kadirgaj,Dist- Nawada
           2.    Rani Devi W/O Chintu Singh Resident of Village- Jamuawa, P.S-
                 Kadirgaj,Dist- Nawada

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 87

                   and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.2

                   is a woman and the informant alleges that on 13.12.2024 at

                   10:30 p.m., the petitioners came and took his daughter to their

                   house but his daughter did not return thus alleges that her

                   daughter was kidnapped.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87827 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

          the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is

          13.12.2024 and the FIR was instituted on 21.12.2024, i.e., after

          a delay of more than seven days, which casts an aspersion on

          the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that the victim

          on coming to know that a false case has been instituted came

          back and got her statement recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S.

          wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution rather

          has stated that she was scolded by her parents, as such, she left

          for the house of her maternal grandmother from where she

          called Vikash who came and they left and thereafter performed

          their marriage in a temple and that petitioners in no manner are

          involved in the occurrence.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the

          event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court

          within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

          anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87827 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with

                         Kadirganj P.S. Case No.329 of 2024, subject to the conditions as

                         laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.