Patna High Court
Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed due to the lack of any prosecution against the petitioner.
Summary
Manoj Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Kurtha, Arwal. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the State was represented by Advocate Sanjay Kumar Sharma. The court examined the application and found that the petitioner had not been prosecuted or faced any imminent arrest. Consequently, the court held that there was no basis to grant anticipatory bail. The application was therefore dismissed, leaving the petitioner without bail protection.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate basis for granting anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code?
- Does the absence of any prosecution or imminent arrest justify the grant of anticipatory bail?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Criminal Procedure Code
- non-prosecution
- High Court
- bail application
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87888 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2025 Thana- Kurth District- Arwal
======================================================
Manoj Yadav S/o Girja Yadav Resident of Village- Mahadev Bigha, P.S.-
Kurtha, Distt.- Arwal
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 22-01-2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP
is present.
2. The instant anticipatory bail application is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…