Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Yogendra SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioners on the condition of a bond and compliance with stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Yogendra Sharma and Choudhary Sharma, were arrested in connection with an alleged arson and assault case (Anandpur PS Case No. 02 of 2024) involving the burning of two JCB machines, a tractor, and a fire‑fighting vehicle, and assaulting an informant and home guards. They sought bail, contending that they were innocent, had no criminal antecedent, and were implicated merely because of their residence, while also pointing to a prior case they had filed against the State. The State opposed bail, arguing that the petitioners were named in the FIR and could not escape liability. The Court noted the clean antecedent of the petitioners, the submission of the charge sheet, the lack of any likelihood of evidence tampering, and the fact that co‑accused in identical circumstances had already been granted bail. Accordingly, the Court granted bail to both petitioners on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding trial cooperation and non‑tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to accused persons charged under IPC sections 353, 335, 427, 332, 333 and 34.
  • Whether the petitioners pose a risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
  • Whether the clean antecedent and the fact that co‑accused in identical cases were granted bail warrant the same relief.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • arson
  • assault
  • Indian Penal Code
  • criminal procedure
  • parity
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88137 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2024 Thana- Anandpur District- Banka
                 ======================================================
           1.     Yogendra Sharma son of Late Bikho Sharma Resident of Village-Ranadih
                  Mohandih, Police Station-Anandpur, District-Banka
           2.    Choudhary Sharma S/O Late Loko Sharma Resident of Village-Ranadih
                 Mohandih, Police Station-Anandpur, District-Banka

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-01-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                    2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with

                   Anandpur P.S. Case No. 02 of 2024 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 353, 335, 427, 332, 333 & 34 of the

                   Indian Penal Code.

                                    3. As per prosecution case, the petitioners along

                   with other co-accused persons are said to have set fire to two

                   JCB machines and one tractor. When the informant and home

                   guards attempted to extinguish the fire using a fire-fighting

                   vehicle, the petitioners and co-accused persons also set the fire-

                   fighting vehicle on fire. It is further alleged that the co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88137 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                            2/4




          persons assaulted the informant and other home guards.

                          4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence

          as alleged in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that there is a case

          and counter-case between the parties and that the petitioners’

          side had instituted the earlier case against the opposite party. It

          is further submitted that the F.I.R. has been instituted against

          twelve named and fifteen unknown persons, who were

          protesting the death of a child allegedly caused due to the

          negligence of State officials. Learned counsel submits that

          merely because the petitioners are residents of the locality, they

          have been implicated in the present case. Petitioners are in

          custody since 21.09.2025. Apart from that petitioners having no

          criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the

          case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the

          prosecution evidence. On similar and identical allegation co-

          accused Shankar Sharma @ Shankar Rana and two others have

          already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court

          vide Cr. Misc. No. 46780 of 2024 and on the principle of parity

          the petitioners also deserves same treatment.

                          5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88137 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                            3/4




          the petitioners are FIR named accused and they cannot escape

          from the allegation made in the FIR.

                          6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, period of custody, on similar and identical allegation co-

          accused persons have already been granted bail, keeping in view

          clean antecedent of petitioners, charge sheet has been submitted

          in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the

          prosecution evidence, argument advanced on behalf of both

          sides and also taking into consideration the material available on

          record, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

          of learned C.J.M., Banka in connection with Anandpur P.S. Case

          No. 02 of 2024, subject to following conditions:-

                          (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or

          mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn

          the affidavit in bail application.

                          (ii) Petitioners will co-operate in trial and will

          remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive

          dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for

          cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

                          (iii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88137 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                                        4/4




                      orpetitioner the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at

                      liberty to move for cancellation of bail.



                                              (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
Nilmani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.