Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amarjeet Kumar Paswan @ Amarjeet PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that anticipatory bail is warranted as the petitioner has a clean record, the allegations are unsubstantiated, and he has pledged cooperation, thus granting bail under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) B.N.S. 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Amarjeet Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 105/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly giving an injection that led to his daughter's death. He argued that the FIR was based on a false informant report, he has a clean antecedent, and he possesses medical training as an EMT. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offence. The Court, considering the lack of substantive evidence, the petitioner's clean record, and his assurance of cooperation, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) B.N.S. 2023. The order also stipulated that the bail could be cancelled if the petitioner fails to cooperate with the investigation.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case under Section 105/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner is likely to abscond or tamper with evidence, justifying denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner's clean antecedent and willingness to cooperate warrant the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 105/3(5) B.N.S.
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 B.N.S.
  • false implication
  • medical negligence
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88202 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- ANGARGHAT District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Amarjeet Kumar Paswan @ Amarjeet Paswan Son of Dasrath Paswan
                 Resident Of Village- Rampur, Samathu, Ward no. 1, Ps- Angarghat, Dist-
                 Samastipur
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Umanath Mishra
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   10-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under Section 105/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case

                   diary has been received but F.S.L. report is awaited, it is next

                   submitted that petitioner is person with clean antecedent and the

                   informant alleges that his daughter about a week back had come to

                   her parental home from her matrimonial home and was suffering

                   from skin disease.          Accordingly, on 18.06.2025 the informant

                   called Bimlesh for giving injection, but Bimlesh sent his brother

                   Amarjit (petitioner), who has no experience of giving injection, as

                   such, after Amarjit injected his daughter, the condition of his

                   daughter deteriorated, thereafter, Amarjit called Bimlesh who came
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88202 of 2025(4) dt.10-04-2026
                                            2/3




          and gave another injection and assured that his daughter would be

          fine, further at 9 P.M., both the brother left and thereafter, the

          condition of his daughter deteriorated and on the way to the

          hospital, she died.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

          submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant

          case by the informant, it is further submitted that from perusal of

          the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that

          informant alleges that petitioner came and gave injection to his

          daughter on account of which her condition deteriorated but

          thereafter Bimlesh was called who also came and gave another

          injection and the condition stablise, as would manifest from the fact

          that the informant alleges that after some time both brothers left. It

          is also submitted that petitioner has successfully completed the

          Emergency Medical Technician-Basis (EMT) Course and her also

          completed his two year’s course of Community Medical Service

          and Essential Drug (CMS & EB) from Global Paramedical

          Institute,    as    would      manifest      from Annexure-2   series   to

          supplementary affidavit, it is further submitted that if privilege of

          anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not

          abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88202 of 2025(4) dt.10-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                    6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                      the case, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the

                      petitioner.

                                    7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of his

                      arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on

                      bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand)

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                      learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur, in

                      connection with Angarghat P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025,              subject to

                      the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of

                      Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik

                      Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                    8. However, it is made clear that if the investigating

                      officer of the case file an application before the learned trial Court

                      bringing to its notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this

                      Court is not cooperating in the investigation, in that event, the

                      learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the

                      petitioner after recording the reason.




                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)
sanjeev/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.