Patna High Court
Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the bail application with liberty to reapply after charge framing.
Summary
Mukesh Kumar (also known as Mukesh Yadav), the petitioner, filed a bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 88203 of 2025 arising from PS case No. 116 of 2023. During the hearing on 11 March 2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail prayer after the charge is framed. The learned counsel argued that the petitioner preferred to wait until the formal framing of charges before seeking bail. Justice Satyavrat Verma considered the request and granted permission for the withdrawal, noting that the petitioner would be free to reapply later. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty to renew the bail prayer after charge framing.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw his bail application and be allowed to reapply for bail after the charge is framed
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- charge framing
- preliminary hearing
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88203 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2023 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda
======================================================
Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav Son of Shri Girish Yadav Resident of
Village- Gongaripar, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranvijay Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 11-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some
arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the bail application
with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after
framing of charge.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as
withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.