Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj Rai @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied as the evidence had been closed and the petitioner was the principal accused.

Summary

The petitioner, Suraj Rai, applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2020 murder allegation where he is alleged to be the main assailant. The petition is his fifth attempt to obtain bail. The court noted that the trial is at the stage where evidence has been closed. Considering the seriousness of the charge and the fact that the petitioner is the principal accused, the court was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was rejected. The decision was delivered by Justice Satyavrat Verma of the Patna High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner when the trial is at the stage of closure of evidence and the petitioner is alleged to be the main assailant.

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • evidence closed
  • main assailant
  • high court
  • Sessions Trial

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88226 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2020 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna
                   ======================================================
                   Suraj Rai @ Suraj Kumar S/o Devendra Rai @ Devendra Prasad Resident of
                   village -Jawahar Colony Road no 4, Postal Park Navratanpur, P.S.-
                   Kankarbagh, District- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                   The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Kumar Rishikesh Chanchal, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                         ORAL ORDER

2     11-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
                     APP for the State.
                                  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is
                     the fifth attempt of the petitioner to seek bail. On query of the
                     Court with regard to stage of trial, it is fairly submitted that the
                     evidence has been closed.
                                  3. Since evidence has been closed and petitioner is
                     alleged to be the main assailant of the deceased, the Court is not
                     inclined to release the petitioner on bail, accordingly, the prayer
                     for grant of bail to the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection
                     with Sessions Trial No.515 of 2022, arising out of Shri
                     Krishnapuri P.S. Case No.88 of 2020, pending in the court of
                     learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIX, Patna.


                                                (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.