Patna High Court
Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was denied to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, applied for bail in a cyber fraud case (Gopalganj Cyber P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he committed cyber fraud against a victim and highlighted that he has been in custody since 3 September 2025 and is also implicated in five other criminal cases. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents. Considering the nature of the charges and his prior record, the bench was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged cyber fraud and his criminal antecedents
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable Securities Act — s. 316(2), 318(4), 319(2)
- Information Technology Act — s. 66D
Subjects
- bail
- cyber fraud
- Information Technology Act
- Section 66D
- criminal antecedent
- court denial
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88249 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Golu Kumar S/O Baliram Prasad R/O Village- Manichapar, P.S - Hathuwa,
District - Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramadhar Shekhar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
5 19-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Gopalganj (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025 registered for the
offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) of the BNS and
under Section 66D of the I.T. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is
accused of committing cyber fraud with the victim.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 3.9.2025 and he is
accused in five more cases.
5. Considering the nature of allegation levelled
against the petitioner and the criminal antecedent of the
petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the
petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.