Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tayazuddin @ Teyazuddin SheikhversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions of bond, sureties and compliance with trial requirements.

Summary

The petitioner, Tayazuddin Sheikh, was arrested in connection with an assault case where he was alleged to have attacked an informant's husband and daughter with a spear, invoking several sections of the B.N.S. He sought bail, claiming innocence, lack of corroboration for the injury to the husband, and that the incident arose from a scuffle during an Aadhaar card queue. The State opposed bail, asserting that the injury report substantiated the allegations. The court considered the petitioner’s period of custody, the fact that co‑accused had already been released on bail, and the material on record. It concluded that bail could be granted with conditions to ensure trial cooperation and prevent tampering with evidence. Accordingly, the petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite allegations of assault under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 118, 126(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the injury report corroborates the prosecution’s allegations sufficiently to deny bail
  • Whether the grant of bail to co‑accused influences the decision on the petitioner’s bail application

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 126(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 74

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • spear attack
  • injury report
  • co‑accused bail
  • criminal procedure
  • B.N.S. sections
  • trial cooperation
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88260 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2025 Thana- MAINATAND District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Tayazuddin @ Teyazuddin Sheikh S/o Sk. Sufiyan R/o Village - Purainiya,
                 P.S - Mainatand, District - West Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Krishna Kant Pandey, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2.     The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Mainatand P.S. Case No. 75/2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 118, 126(2), 74,

                   109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                 3. As per prosecution case, there is allegation against

                   the petitioner who is said to have assaulted the informant’s

                   husband by means of spear on the hand. It is further alleged that

                   the petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant’s daughter

                   by means of spear on the leg as a result of which she sustained

                   leg injury.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88260 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                            2/4




          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged

          in the FIR. The petitioner is languishing in custody since

          14.10.2025 and bears one criminal antecedent in which he is on

          bail. There is no intention to kill the informant’s husband and

          daughter rather the allegation of assaulting on the hand of the

          informant’s husband has not been corroborated by the injury

          report as mentioned in the impugned order. He further submits

          that there is only one allegation against the petitioner who is

          said to have assaulted the informant’s daughter and the injury is

          incised wound on the lower leg. The dispute arose on the simple

          matter where the petitioner and others were in queue for the

          purpose of getting Adhar card and during course of getting

          Adhar card some scuffle has taken place and the petitioner has

          been falsely implicated in the present case. He orally submits

          that charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no

          likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. In the

          light of aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no offence

          is made out against the petitioner under Section 109(1) of

          B.N.S. Co-accused Sheikh Zakir and Md. Hasantaz against

          whom there is specific allegation, have already been granted

          bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc.

          No.44103/2025 and the case of present petitioner stands on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88260 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                            3/4




          better footing.

                       5.    The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that

          there is specific allegation against the petitioner and the same is

          corroborated by the injury report and hence, the petitioner does

          not deserve bail.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, period of custody, co-accused have already been granted

          bail, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking

          into consideration the material available on record, let the

          petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

          Magistrate-1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection

          with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 75/2025, subject to following

          conditions:-

                       (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother

          or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the

          affidavit in bail application.

                       (ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain

          present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates

          without appropriate permission, would be a ground for
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88260 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                     cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

                                  (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                     witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                     for cancellation of bail.


                                             (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

amitkumar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.