Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court allowed the petition for anticipatory bail, subject to bond and surety conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in an excise case where 2 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from his vehicle and three co‑accused were arrested. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, had lent the motorcycle to Basant Yadav, and had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, asserting his innocence and clean criminal record. The State opposed his anticipatory bail, contending that the recovery of liquor from the motorcycle linked him to the offence. The Court examined the facts, noting the petitioner’s absence from the scene and lack of incriminating material in his possession. Considering these circumstances and his clean antecedents, the Court ordered that, if arrested, the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond and sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to a person not named in the FIR but whose vehicle was used in the alleged offence
  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from the petitioner’s motorcycle suffices to deny bail

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • motor vehicle ownership
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30
  • Section 32
  • Section 37
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8846 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1390 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Ravi Kumar Son of Gopal Yadav Resident of Ward no. 14, Shahpur road
                 Tikri, PS- Aurangabad Town Dist- Aurangabad

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Adarsh Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Asha Devi, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                    2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Aurangabad Excise P.S. Case No. 1390 of 2025

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a),

                   32(3), 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,

                   2018.

                                    3. As per prosecution case, 2 litre illicit chulai

                   liquor was recovered from the motorcycle in question and co-

                   accused Basant Yadav, Amresh Yadav and Sanjay Yadav were

                   apprehended on the spot.

                                    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is not named in FIR. During the course of

                   investigation, the name of the petitioner has been transpired in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8846 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                            2/3




          this case as the owner of the motorcycle in question. He further

          submits that on the alleged date of occurrence petitioner gave

          his motorcycle to Basant Yadav and he misused the said

          motorcycle. Petitioner had no knowledge that his motorcycle

          was being used for carrying illicit liquor. Petitioner was not

          found at the place of occurrence. No incriminating article has

          been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

          Petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged

          in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to

          high handedness of the police. In the light of the aforesaid facts

          and circumstances of the case, no case is made out against the

          petitioner under the provisions of Bihar Prohibition and Excise

          Act. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent.

                          5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the

          prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that

          the alleged recovery has been made the motorcycle in question

          and hence, petitioner cannot escape from the allegation made in

          FIR.

                          6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, petitioner was not found at the place of occurrence,

          keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner,         argument

          advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8846 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       consideration the material available on record, the petitioner

                       above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

                       learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be

                       released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

                       10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                       amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise

                       Court No. II, Aurangabad, Bihar                     in connection with

                       Aurangabad Excise P.S. Case No. 1390 of 2025, subject to the

                       conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

                                    7. The application stands allowed.



                                               (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
alok/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.