Patna High Court
Ram Pravesh RamversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was not granted to the petitioner.
Summary
Ram Pravesh Ram was arrested in connection with a rape allegation under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim's statement was recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. The petitioner, in custody since 26‑08‑2025, applied for bail. The court examined the seriousness of the alleged offence and the evidentiary material, notably the victim's statement. Considering the gravity of the charges, the court was not inclined to grant bail and dismissed the application.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to an accused in a rape case under Section 64 of the BNSS and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 183, 64
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act — s. 4, 6
Subjects
- bail
- rape
- POCSO
- BNSS
- criminal procedure
- custody
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88463 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2025 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali
======================================================
Ram Pravesh Ram Son of Late Shivnandan Ram Resident of village - Chhoti
Jawaj, P.S.- Mahnar, District - Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. XXXX Kumari Daughter of Amarjeet Ram Resident of Village - Chhoti
Zawaj, P.S.- Mahnar, District - Vaishali
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP
for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Mahnar P.S. Case No. 285 of 2025 registered for the offence
punishable under Sections 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
3. As per the FIR, the petitioner is alleged to have
committed rape with the victim girl.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 26.08.2025.
5. The case of the prosecution is supported by the
statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 of the
BNSS.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88463 of 2025(4) dt.19-03-2026
2/2
6. Considering the gravity of offence, I am not
inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
Checking your session…