Patna High Court
Avinash Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was denied to the petitioner.
Summary
Avinash Kumar Paswan applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 987 of 2024) for an alleged murder under Section 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner allegedly killed the deceased with a hammer, has confessed to the crime, and CCTV footage corroborates his participation. The court examined the seriousness of the offence, the confession, and the evidentiary material. Considering these factors, the judge was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a murder case under Section 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita given his confession and CCTV evidence.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 140(3)
Subjects
- bail
- murder
- confession
- CCTV evidence
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88618 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-987 Year-2024 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna
======================================================
Avinash Kumar Paswan S/o Nagendra Paswan Resident of Village- Arya
Nagar, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sujeet Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
5 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kadam
Kuan P.S. Case No. 987 of 2024 registered for the offence
punishable under Sections 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita.
3. The petitioner is said to have killed the deceased
with hammer. He has confessed his guilt and the CCTV footage
also supports the participation of the petitioner.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to
grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
Checking your session…