Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jagrita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court held that anticipatory bail should be granted subject to conditions, as the allegations were based only on suspicion and the petitioner was not present at the alleged site.

Summary

Jagrita Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from her residence, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She argued that she was not present at the location, the area was open to all, and there was no material linking her to the offence beyond suspicion. The State opposed the bail, contending that her name in the FIR precludes such relief. The Court considered the petitioner’s gender, lack of presence at the scene, and the insufficiency of evidence, and granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond and sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The application was allowed, permitting her release on bail if arrested within six weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. in view of the allegations under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
  • Whether mere suspicion and the petitioner’s absence from the alleged place of recovery are sufficient grounds to deny anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions
  • gender considerations

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8880 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2025 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Jagrita Devi Wife of Pappu Bind @ Pappu Bin Resident of Village- Tetarahar
                 Bind Toli, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Satyapal Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in

                   connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025, registered

                   for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                                3. As per prosecution-case, there is alleged recovery

                   of 5 litre country-made illicit liquor from the Palani of husk

                   house of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as

                   alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the alleged place of

                   recovery is an open place which is accessible to all and

                   petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and she has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8880 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                            2/3




          no concern with the alleged recovery. In the light of aforesaid

          fact, no offence is made out against the petitioner. Petitioner has

          two criminal antecedents in which she is already on bail.

          Because of having criminal antecedents, petitioner has been

          falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of suspicion.

          Except suspicion, there is nothing on record to connect the

          petitioner with the alleged occurrence.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and

          submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and she cannot

          escape from the allegation made in the F.I.R.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, petitioner is a lady and she was not found at the place of

          occurrence, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also

          taking into consideration the material available on record, the

          petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender

          before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from

          today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond

          of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge,

          Excise Court No. 2, Buxar in connection with Sikraul P.S. Case

          No. 149 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8880 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                   7. The application stands allowed.



                                              (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

K.C.Jha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.