Patna High Court

Md. Tanveer @ Md. Tanveer AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 5 February 2026
Disposal: BAIL GRANTED
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, granting bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Tanveer Alam, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his participation in a violent assault on his family, with charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. He claimed a clean criminal record and asserted that the allegations were false and motivated by a personal dispute with the informant, who also faced a separate case filed by the petitioner. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court considered the petitioner's clean antecedent, the possibility of false implication, and the need to prevent undue hardship, and directed that he be released on bail upon surrendering within six weeks, subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The application for anticipatory bail was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances alleged
Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication and clean antecedent warrants bail despite serious charges

Legislation cited

B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 288, 329(4), 3(5), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 61(2), 74
B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)

Subjects

anticipatory bail
false implication
clean antecedent
Section 482
bail conditions
criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88987 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2025 Thana- Lakho District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Tanveer @ Md. Tanveer Alam S/o Md. Manjoor R/o Village - Nawtoliya
                 Dhabauli, P.S - Lakho, District - Begusarai

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Randhir Kumar No 1
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 74, 288, 109, 352, 351(2),

                   351(3), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                   that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the

                   informant alleges that on 11.09.2025 at 7.00 A.M., nine

                   accused persons including the petitioner entered his house

                   and assaulted his family members including his mother and

                   sister. Further, Md. Riyazul assaulted his younger brother

                   by pistol causing injury on head. It is next alleged that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88987 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2026
                                            2/3




          accused persons, in order to establish their dominance, had

          planned to commit the occurrence with the help of other

          gang members.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

          that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case

          by the informant. It is next submitted that from the side of

          the petitioner, Lakho P. S. Case No. 191 of 2025 has been

          instituted against the informant and his side and the

          allegation in the instant FIR against the petitioner is general

          and omnibus in nature.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. Sri Rabindra Kumar opposes the

          anticipatory bail application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the

          learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into

          consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean

          antecedent, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his

          arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

          period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his

          furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

          the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88987 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         pending/successor Court in connection with Lakho P. S.

                         Case No.190 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down

                         under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…