Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dhiraj @ Dhiraj Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the modification application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Chaudhary, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking a modification of an earlier order. During the hearing on 18-03-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the modification application. The court, exercising its discretion, granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original application were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the modification application filed in the criminal miscellaneous petition

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • modification petition
  • court discretion
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.891 of 2026
                                                In
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75302 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Dhiraj @ Dhiraj Kumar Chaudhary Son of Sadanand Chaudhary Resident of
                  village- Kusai, Ninchi Toli, Football Ground, Ps- doranda, Dist- Ranchi
                  Jharkhand P/A- Resident of village- Pakara, Ps- Naugachia, Dist- Bhagalpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Vinod Gautam
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Umesh Lal Verma
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    18-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

                    seeks permission to withdraw the instant modification

                    application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.