Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the anticipatory bail application.

Summary

Vijay Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he surrendered before the authorities. He then sought the court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that withdrawal was permissible after surrender. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the anticipatory bail application after surrendering.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89141 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- BHAIROGANJ District- West Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Vijay Yadav Son of Sharda Yadav Resident of Village- Kharhat, P.S.-
                  Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar Sinha
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    16-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner, during the pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application, has surrendered and thus, seeks permission to

                    withdraw the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.