Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Taki Imam @ Taki Imam @ Md. Taqui ImamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Taki Imam, filed a second anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing on 18-02-2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw this application. The Court, after hearing both parties, granted the request. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw a pending anticipatory bail application

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89209 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2025 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka
                   ======================================================
                   Taki Imam @ Taki Imam @ Md. Taqui Imam S/O Late Ali Imam R/O Vill.-
                   Shyampur, Daka, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Dist.- Banka, Bihar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                   The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Sonam Kumari, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                         ORAL ORDER

2     18-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                     APP for the State.

                                  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

                     seeks permission to withdraw the second anticipatory bail

                     application.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. The instant anticipatory bail application is

                     dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.