Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail.

Summary

Mithilesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on the informant's family under several sections of the BNS. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the FIR was lodged to give a communal colour after the parties had settled their dispute. The State opposed his request for pre‑arrest bail. The Court examined the FIR, noted the presence of general and omnibus allegations, and concluded that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case for bail. Accordingly, the Court ordered his release on pre‑arrest bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and verification of his criminal antecedents by the District Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail despite general and omnibus allegations in the FIR
  • Whether the prima facie case for bail is established in the absence of specific evidence against the petitioner
  • Whether conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS are satisfied for granting bail

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 351, 352
  • BNSS — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • false FIR
  • communal motive
  • omnibus allegation
  • Section 482
  • bail bond
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89287 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2025 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Singh S/o Santosh Singh R/o Village- Sikaria,
                 P.S- Karakat, Dist- Rohtas.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, learned counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ganesh Prasad

                   Singh, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Karakat P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence(s)           punishable           under           Sections          109,

                   191(2),191(3),126(2),115(2),109,351,352 of the BNS.

                                 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, allegedly

                   the petitioner along with other co-accused assaulted the father

                   and other family members of the informant.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

                   been implicated in the present case. It is the case of the

                   petitioner that to give colour of communal nature, a false FIR
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89287 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            2/3




          has been lodged after the parties have settled their dispute on the

          previous day, while the occurrence has taken place on

          13.04.2025. There is general and omnibus allegation against the

          petitioner and specific allegation of assaulting the father of the

          informant on his head by means of brick is against co-accused

          Haribhushan Kumar. There is case and counter case between the

          parties.

                        5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the

          prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

                        6. Having considered the rival submissions made on

          behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation

          made in the FIR and also the fact that there is general and

          omnibus allegation against the petitioner, I am of the opinion

          that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released

          on pre-arrest bail.

                       7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be

          released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks

          from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judaical Magistrate, 1 st

          Bikaramganj, Rohtas / Concerned Court in connection with
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89287 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Karakat P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025, subject to the conditions as

                     laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

                                  8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the

                     criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the

                     petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been

                     stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will

                     automatically lose its force.



                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.