Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Reena Devi @ Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bond, sureties and verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedents.

Summary

Reena Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 34 litres of liquor in a half‑constructed house. The petitioner, a woman with two prior excise cases, argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and that the recovery was based on secret information without proper investigation. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and directed verification of her criminal antecedents. If more than two prior cases are found, the bail would be revoked; otherwise, it would be confirmed. The petitioner also undertook to deposit Rs.1,500 with the Advocates’ Association.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
  • Whether the circumstances of the alleged recovery justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents affect the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • Section 30
  • provisional bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89312 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-575 Year-2023 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Reena Devi @ Rina Devi D/o Nirmal Manjhi, W/o Dinesh Manjhi R/o
                 Village- Maurya Path Masaurhi, P.S- Shastri Nagar, Dist- Patna.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Abhoy Kumar Kashyap, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms. Pushpa Sinha-1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   31-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered

                   for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedents of two cases under the Excise Act and

                   is a woman and allegation is of recovery of 34 litres of liquor

                   from half constructed thatched house of the petitioner. It is next

                   submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such,

                   nothing was recovered from her conscious possession and even

                   alleged recovery is from a house which was under construction

                   where no one was staying but then was accessible to villagers at

                   large and it appears that someone inimical to the family
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89312 of 2025(3) dt.31-01-2026
                                            2/3




          concealed meager amount of liquor with an intent to implicate

          the entire family but then petitioner came to be implicated based

          on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate

          someone without holding a proper investigation moreso when

          petitioner carries antecedents under the Excise Act. It is further

          submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to

          excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either at the

          instance of Chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or

          secret information without holding a proper investigation.

                       4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       5. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on

          provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bond in the

          sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special

          Judge, Excise-II, Patna in connection with Shastri Nagar P.S.

          Case No.575 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under

          Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                       6. The application stands allowed.
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89312 of 2025(3) dt.31-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                                      7. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after

                         accepting the provisional bail bond of the petitioner shall verify

                         the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

                         found that petitioner has antecedents of more than two cases,

                         then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of

                         obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed her antecedent before

                         this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail

                         order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found

                         that petitioner has antecedents of only two cases, in that event,

                         the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed

                         forthwith.

                                      8. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner,

                         based on instruction, submits that petitioner undertakes to

                         deposit an amount of Rs.1500/- with Advocates’ Association,

                         Patna High Court within a period of two weeks from today.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.