Patna High Court
Sakil @ Mohammad SakilversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, finding no sufficient basis to detain the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Sakil @ Mohammad Sakil, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 273/2023) under Section 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, where 120 kg of Mahua flower was recovered from a tempo. The prosecution alleged the petitioner was involved, but he had sold the vehicle on 17‑03‑2021, well before the alleged incident on 16‑04‑2023, and had no knowledge or possession of the seized goods. He also had no criminal antecedents. The State opposed the bail, arguing the petitioner was named in the FIR. The Court examined the facts, the clean record, and the lack of any incriminating link, and, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond and sureties. The order directed his release if arrested within six weeks, with conditions imposed by the Special Excise Judge, Danapur.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is liable under Section 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act despite having sold the vehicle before the alleged offence.
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. in the present circumstances.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 30(c)
- Mahua flower seizure
- vehicle sale
- clean antecedent
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act
- B.N.S.S. Section 482(2)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8956 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2023 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna
======================================================
Sakil @ Mohammad Sakil S/o Md. Vsi Resident of Village- Bhaluhipur
Arrah, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Suman Kumari Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Sahpur P.S. Case No. 273 of 2023, registered
for the offence punishable under Section 30(c) of Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
3. As per prosecution-case, 120 k.g. Mahua flower
was recovered from the tempo in question and F.I.R. has been
lodged against Chandramuni Devi and the owner and driver of
the vehicle bearing Regn. No. BR03PA 8173 found at the place
of occurrence.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as
alleged in the F.I.R. It has been specifically stated in para-10 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8956 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
2/3
the bail petition that the occurrence took place on 16.04.2023
which is more than two years after the petitioner had already
sold the vehicle on 17.03.2021 and copy of the agreement is
annexed as Annexure-3. Petitioner has no concern with the
vehicle and the and petitioner has neither knowledge nor direct
or indirect connection with the alleged recovery of Mahua
flower from the vehicle. Petitioner was not found at the place of
occurrence and nothing incriminating was recovered from the
conscious possession of the petitioner. Apart from that,
petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. In light of the
aforesaid facts and circumstances, no allegation, as alleged in
the F.I.R., is made out against the petitioner.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and
submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and he cannot
escape from the allegations made in the F.I.R.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, petitioner was not found at the place of occurrence,
keeping in view clean antecedent of the petitioner, argument
advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into
consideration the material available on record, the petitioner
above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8956 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
3/3
learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be
released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of
Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge,
Danapur in connection with Sahpur P.S. Case No. 273 of 2023,
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of
the B.N.S.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
K.C.Jha/-
U T
Checking your session…