Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shatrudhan Manjhi @ Shatrudhan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioners, subject to strict conditions, as the injuries were simple and there was no indication of flight risk or evidence tampering.

Summary

The petitioners, three residents of Mastipur village, sought bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged attempted kidnapping and assault. They claimed innocence, stating the allegations were vague, the injuries to the victim were minor, and they had no criminal record. The State opposed the bail application. The court considered the nature of the injuries, the seriousness of the charges, and the petitioners' antecedents, and decided to grant bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 each and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC and additional safeguards. The conditions include appearance before the trial court, non‑interference with witnesses, and refraining from further offences. The bail order was issued pending the petitioners' surrender or arrest within six weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused despite charges of kidnapping, assault, and other serious offences under the IPC.
  • Whether the minor nature of the victim's injuries justifies the grant of bail.
  • Whether the petitioners pose a risk of tampering with evidence or fleeing, warranting denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • assault
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • injury report
  • false implication
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89599 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-839 Year-2023 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Shatrudhan Manjhi @ Shatrudhan Kumar S/O Ore Manjhi R/O Village-
                  Mastipur, P.S- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya.
           2.    Dhiraj Manjhi @ Dhiraj Kumar S/O Basudeo Manjhi R/O Village- Mastipur,
                 P.S- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya.
           3.    Krish Manjhi @ Krish Kumar S/O Basudeo Manjhi R/O Village- Mastipur,
                 P.S- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   23-02-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No.839 of 2023 dated

                   01.11.2023, registered for the offence punishable under Sections

                   341, 342, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                   3. As per the FIR, when the informant’s son went to

                   meet his friend, 15 persons approached him and attempted to

                   kidnap him. They assaulted the informant’s son with fists and

                   slaps, as a result of which he sustained injuries.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89599 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

          the present case. The allegations levelled against the petitioners

          are general and omnibus in nature. As per the injury report, the

          injuries sustained by the injured person are simple in nature, as

          no bony lesion was found and the CT scan of the brain shows no

          fracture. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioners have no

          criminal antecedents.

                          5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

          has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                          6. Considering that the injury sustained by the

          injured is simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be

          released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before

          the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from

          today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gaya/ Successor Court in

          connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No.839 of 2023, subject to

          the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS

          as well as the following conditions:

                       (i) One of the bailors should be the family

          member/relative/ known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide

          official document/ personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89599 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                                      (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every

                         date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two

                         consecutive       dates     without      plausible   reason   will   entail

                         cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                      (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or

                         promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                         failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                         cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                      (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any

                         criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                         to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.



                                                                   (Ajit Kumar, J)

shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.