Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(2), 338, 336(3) and 347(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). He is alleged to have fraudulently sold a motorcycle to the informant’s husband by claiming ownership, while the vehicle remained at his residence. The petitioner contended he is innocent, that the FIR was lodged by the wife rather than the buyer, and that there is no documentary evidence of the sale. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the Court, considering the circumstances, ordered that the petitioner be granted anticipatory bail subject to surrender within four weeks, a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and compliance with conditions under Section 482 of the BNSS. The order directs surrender to the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, West Champaran.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the BNSS in view of the alleged fraud and the offences charged.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • fraud
  • motorcycle sale
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89625 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2025 Thana- Jagdishpur District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Pappu Kumar S/O Uday Narayan Singh R/O Village- Siswa Maldahiya, P.S-
                 Paharpur, District- East Champaran.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Raki Alam
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Anil Prasad Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has

                   been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in a case

                   instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5),

                   318(4), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 347(1) of the BNS.

                                 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he

                   fraudulently sold a motorcycle to the informant’s husband.

                   As per the FIR, the petitioner sold the said motorcycle to

                   the informant’s husband by representing himself as the

                   lawful owner, claiming that he had purchased the vehicle

                   from one Sheikh Fakre Alam. It is further alleged that,

                   subsequently, when an OTP was sought from Sheikh Fakre
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89625 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                            2/3




          Alam for filing the challan, he disclosed that the motorcycle

          was still lying at his residence. Thereupon, the informant’s

          husband realized that the petitioner had committed fraud

          while selling the vehicle to him.

                        4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. It is further submitted that the

          informant’s        husband,        who      allegedly   purchased   the

          motorcycle, has not lodged the FIR; rather, the present FIR

          has been instituted by his wife. Moreover, the alleged date

          of purchase of the motorcycle has not been mentioned in the

          FIR. There is also no documentary evidence whatsoever to

          show that the petitioner sold the motorcycle to the

          informant’s husband. A statement has been made in

          paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no

          criminal antecedent.

                        5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties

          and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated

          above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89625 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court

                      below within a period of four weeks from the date of

                      receipt/production of this order and in the event of his arrest

                      or surrender in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case no.

                      174 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      learned Judicial magistrate, 1st Class, West Champaran,

                      Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under section

                      482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).



                                                                    (S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
Khushbu/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.