Patna High Court
Anshu Chandrawanshi @ Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The Court dismissed the bail applications, denying bail to the petitioners.
Summary
The petitioners, Ashish Raj Yadav and Anshu Chandrawanshi, applied for bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases arising from Barun Police Station Case No. 20 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were involved in the killing of the deceased. During trial, all private witnesses had been examined and only three witnesses remained to be examined. Considering the seriousness of the alleged murder and the advanced stage of the trial, the Court was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail applications were dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a murder case involving alleged killing and possession of arms at the stage where most witnesses have been examined
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 103(1), 3(5), 61(2)
Subjects
- bail
- murder
- Arms Act
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- high court
- trial stage
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80365 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Ashish Raj Yadav S/O Rakesh Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Rakiyan
Bigaha, P.S.- Amjhor, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 89700 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Anshu Chandrawanshi @ Anshu Kumar S/o Satendra Chandrawanshi @
Satendra Kahar R/o Village - - Jamuhar, P.S - Mufassil (Dehri), District -
Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80365 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 89700 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate
Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocate
Mr. Rakesh Ranjan Srivastava
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 24-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP
for the State and learned counsel for the informant in both the
cases.
2. The petitioner of both the aforesaid cases seeks bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80365 of 2025(4) dt.24-03-2026
2/2
in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025 registered
for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2)
of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are
involved in the killing the deceased.
4. In the trial, all the private witnesses have been
examined and only three witnesses are left to be examined.
5. Considering the allegation and the stage of trial, I
am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the applications stand dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
Checking your session…