Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhishek Mohan JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner on the basis that the alleged relationship was consensual and he has no criminal antecedent.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhishek Mohan Jha, was charged under Sections 69, 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. for allegedly sexually exploiting a woman on a false pretext of marriage for eight years. He contended that the relationship was consensual, noting that he is the cousin of the woman's husband and that the prosecution itself acknowledged frequent visits to her house. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, arguing lack of criminal antecedent and the consensual nature of the relationship. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the long‑standing consensual relationship and the petitioner’s clean record, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, with conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether the alleged eight‑year relationship constitutes a consensual adult relationship exempting the petitioner from offences under Sections 69, 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S.
  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. in the present facts
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal record warrants bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • consensual relationship
  • sexual exploitation
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 B.N.S.S.
  • B.N.S. offences
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89796 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Abhishek Mohan Jha Son of Ram Naresh Jha Resident of village Mahinam,
                 P.S.- Bahera, District - Darbhanga.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 69, 115(2),

                   126(2), 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S.

                                3. The allegation in the first information report is that

                   the petitioner sexually exploited the informant on false pretext

                   of marriage for last eight years.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner happens to be the cousin of the husband of the

                   informant and it is the case of the prosecution itself that he was

                   frequently visiting the house of the informant while the husband

                   of the informant was living at Mumbai. The allegation of having

                   relationship with the informant for a period of eight years on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89796 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                             2/3




          pretext of marriage indicates that the said relationship, if any,

          between the informant and the petitioner would be a consensual

          relationship between two adults and would not amount to

          offence of rape. It has also been submitted that there is land

          dispute between the parties and an informatory petition had

          been filed on behalf of the father of the petitioner against the

          informant.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the

          application for anticipatory bail.

                           6. Taking into consideration the facts and

          circumstances and also considering that the relationship

          between the petitioner and the informant having continued over

          a period of eight long years is clearly indicative of a consensual

          relationship between the parties and the petitioner happens to be

          the cousin of the husband of the informant, let the above named

          petitioner, who has no criminal antecedent, in the event of his

          arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

          of    the       learned         court         below   where   the    case   is

          pending/successor          court         in    connection     with    Mahila
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89796 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       P.S. Case No. 146 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down

                       under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.