Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Singh @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail as he has made out a prima facie case of self‑defence and the injury is simple.

Summary

Manoj Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with an assault case (Bidupur P.S. Case No. 329/2025) alleging that he attacked an informant and her family with a sickle, causing head injuries. The petitioner claimed he acted in self‑defence during a petty dispute and that the injury was simple, as confirmed by a medical board, and he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the existence of a case‑and‑counter‑case scenario and the lack of serious injury. Considering these factors, the court found a prima facie case for bail and ordered the petitioner’s release on pre‑arrest bail with a bond and sureties. The order also directed the district court to verify any other criminal antecedents, which could nullify the bail if found.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail despite the serious nature of the alleged assault offences.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 109, 115(2), 117(1), 118(1), 126(2), 3(5), 351(3), 352, 74, 76
  • BNSS — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • self‑defence
  • assault
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 482
  • Bihar Penal Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89842 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2025 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar S/O Lal Babu Singh
                 R/O Vill.- Kanchanpur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ravish Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                   Heard Mr. Ravish Mishra, learned counsel appearing

                   on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Parmanand Kumar, learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 329/2025 registered for the

                   offence(s)                 punishable                under               Sections

                   115(2),126(2),109,118(1),117(1),74,76,352,351(3),3(5), of the

                   BNS.

                                 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused

                   persons named therein including the petitioner assaulted the

                   informant by means of sickle, causing head injury to her. When

                   family members of the informant came in her rescue, the

                   accused persons also assaulted them, causing injuries to them.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89842 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

          been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that

          there is case and counter case between the parties and due to a

          petty dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides

          entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioner may

          have caused some injury on the person of the informant.       The

          Medical Board was constituted and as per the opinion of the

          Medical Board, the injury sustained by the informant is simple

          in nature, caused by hard and blunt substance. Petitioner has

          clean antecedent.

                        5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the

          prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

                        6. Having considered the rival submissions made on

          behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation

          made in the FIR and also the fact that there is case and counter

          case between the parties and in the self-defence, petitioner may

          have caused some injury on the person of the informant without

          intention and moreover the doctor has opined that the       injury

          sustained by the informant is simple in nature, caused by hard

          and blunt substance, I am of the opinion that petitioner has,

          prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

                       7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89842 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

                     before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks

                     from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                     Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at

                     Hajipur / Concerned Court in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case

                     No. 329/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                     Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

                                  8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the

                     criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the

                     petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been

                     stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will

                     automatically lose its force.


                                               (Purnendu Singh, J)

Sanjay/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.