Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh Kumar Sah @ Santosh SahuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to Bimal Devi subject to conditions prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Summary

Four family members were implicated in a FIR (Case No. 236 of 2025) filed under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault, outraging modesty and theft. The first three petitioners, who had already been arrested, withdrew their anticipatory bail applications. The fourth petitioner, Bimal Devi, a woman, sought anticipatory bail, asserting she had no role in the alleged offences and had no criminal antecedent. The State opposed, noting her name was in the FIR. Considering the allegations, her lack of prior record, and her gender, the Court exercised its power under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. to grant anticipatory bail with specific conditions, including a bail bond, sureties, and compliance directives. The order directed that she be released on bail if arrested or surrendered within four weeks, subject to the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to Bimal Devi under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. despite the FIR and serious allegations under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • bail
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita
  • gender
  • FIR
  • section 438

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90056 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2025 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
           1.     Santosh Kumar Sah @ Santosh Sahu S/o- Gowan Sahu Village- Asraha PS-
                  Keoti District- Darbhanga
           2.    Dhiru Kumar @ Dhiru Kumar Sah S/o- Raj Kumar Sahu Village- Asraha
                 PS- Keoti District- Darbhanga
           3.    Raj Kumar Sahu S/o- Mahabir Sahu Village- Asraha PS- Keoti District-
                 Darbhanga
           4.    Bimal Devi W/o- Raj Kumar Sahu Village- Asraha PS- Keoti District-
                 Darbhanga

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                   At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners

                   submit that petitioner no. 01,Santosh Kumar Sah @ Santosh

                   Sahu, petitioner no.2, Dhiru Kumar @ Dhiru Kumar Sah and

                   petitioner no.3, Raj Kumar Sahu have been arrested and as

                   such he may be permitted to withdraw the anticipatory bail

                   application of the said petitioners.

                                2. Permission accorded.

                                3. The anticipatory bail application of petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90056 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/4




          no. 01,Santosh Kumar Sah @ Santosh Sahu, petitioner no.2,

          Dhiru Kumar @ Dhiru Kumar Sah and petitioner no.3, Raj

          Kumar Sahu as recorded stand dismissed as withdrawn.

                       4. Heard the parties.

                       5. The petitioner namely Bimal Devi is apprehending

          arrest in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 236 of 2025

          instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 74, 76,

          351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 lodged

          on 14.09.2025 by the informant, Ramashish Sah.

                       6. As per the prosecution story, the informant

          alleged that after abuse and on objection, the assault took

          place. The allegation of outraging modesty and snatching of

          chain is/are also there. This led to the FIR.

                       7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the entire family members have been roped in, the petitioner

          no.4, Bimal Devi is a lady, had no role to play in the matter.

                       8. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that

          her name is in the FIR.

                       9. Considering the submissions of the parties as

          also the fact that she has no criminal antecedent, is a lady, FIR

          is there, shall be facing the trial, in that background, this

          Court is inclined to extend her the privilege of anticipatory
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90056 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            3/4




          bail.

                       10. Let the petitioner no.4, Bimal Devi be released

          on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the

          concerned court within a period of four weeks from the

          receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in

          connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 236 of 2025 to the

          satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IX, Darbhanga subject to the

          conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as

          also the other conditions.

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner no.4, Bimal Devi who shall

          provide official document (Aadhar Card, Voter ID, Pan Card

          etc.) to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner no.4, Bimal Devi shall appear on

          each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so

          for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail

          cancellation of her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iii) the petitioner no.4, Bimal Devi shall in no

          way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper

          with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty

          to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90056 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                         4/4




                                    (iv) the petitioner no.4, Bimal Devi shall desist

                       from committing any criminal offence again, failing which

                       the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of her

                       bail bonds.



                                                      (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.