Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mithlesh Mahto @ Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond and sureties.

Summary

Mithlesh Mahto sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging he assaulted the informant and his family over a land construction dispute. The FIR, filed two days after the incident, accused Mahto of inflicting a simple head injury with an iron rod, but he has no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences listed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The Court noted the familial (agnate) relationship, the minor nature of the injury, and the lack of antecedents, and therefore ordered that Mahto be released on bail if arrested, subject to a bond and sureties. The bail order was conditioned on compliance with Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in view of the allegations under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNSS, 2023.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged injury and the petitioner’s clean record justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • BNSS
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 438
  • Section 482
  • injury
  • agnate

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90189 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2024 Thana- KHANPURA District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Mithlesh Mahto @ Mithlesh Kumar S/o Late Ramavtar Mahto R/o Village -
                 Masina, Ward No. 2, P.S - Khanpur, District - Samastipur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umanath Mishra
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2.    The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 118, 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The allegation in the First Information Report is

                   that on being opposed to construction being made by the

                   accused persons in the land of the informant, the accused

                   persons physically assaulted the informant and his family

                   members.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits at the

                   outset that the informant and the petitioner are agnates and the

                   F.I.R. demonstrates the fact that the dispute between the parties

                   was due to construction being done by the petitioner with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90189 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/3




          allegation that they were encroaching upon the informant’s land.

          As a matter of fact, the informant and his family members were

          the aggressors and the F.I.R. itself was lodged after a delay of

          two days for which no explanation has been tendered. It is

          further submitted that there is a direct allegation against the

          petitioner of having inflicted a blow by iron rod on the head of

          the informant due to which he got injured. The injury sustained

          by him is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance as

          would be evident from the injury report (Annexure-P/2).

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for

          anticipatory bail on the basis of allegations made in the First

          Information Report.

                       6.    Taking      into     consideration   the   facts   and

          circumstances and considering the fact that the informant and

          the petitioner are agnates having dispute with regard to

          construction being made upon the land, coupled with the factum

          of simple nature of injury sustained by the informant, let the

          above named petitioner, who has no criminal antecedent, be

          released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

          learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today,

          on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90189 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                          3/3




                        the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor

                        Court in connection with Khanpur P.S. Case No. 283 of 2024

                        Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Samastipur, subject to the

                        condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/

                        Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

                        (BNSS), 2023.



                                                  (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.