Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the conditions stipulated under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.

Summary

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025, wherein the prosecution alleged recovery of 954.720 litres of illicit foreign liquor from his residence, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from a joint house and that there was no material linking him personally to the offence, despite having prior criminal cases pending. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the recovery was made from the petitioner’s house and that he could not escape liability. The Court examined the absence of the petitioner at the scene, the lack of direct evidence, and the procedural safeguards under Section 482(2) of the CrPC. It held that anticipatory bail could be granted, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, and conditioned on surrender to the Special Judge within six weeks. Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail is warranted in a case of alleged possession of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
  • Whether the material on record sufficiently links the petitioner to the alleged offence.
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the CrPC are appropriate.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9019 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Mishra S/O Sanjeev Mishra @ Sanjiv
                 Kumar Mishra Resident of village- Neerpur, Police Station- Karpurigram,
                 District- Samastipur.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Khurshid Anwar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025,

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                                 3. As per prosecution-case, there is alleged recovery

                   of 954.720 litre illicit foreign liquor from the house of

                   petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as

                   alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits in para-10 that the

                   alleged recovery was made from the joint house of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9019 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                            2/3




          and petitioner cannot be held responsible for the same. Apart

          from that, petitioner is having criminal antecedent of four cases

          out of which in three cases he is on bail. Petitioner has been

          roped in one case after another in mechanical manner without

          any basis. Except suspicion, there is nothing on record to

          connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. In light of

          the aforesaid facts and circumstances, no allegation, as alleged

          in the F.I.R., is made out against the petitioner.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and

          submits that there is alleged recovery from the house and

          petitioner cannot escape from the allegations made in the F.I.R.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, petitioner was not found at the place of occurrence,

          argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into

          consideration the material available on record, the petitioner

          above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

          learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be

          released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise-

          II, Samastipur, District-Samastipur in connection with Excise
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9019 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      Sadar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025, subject to the conditions as

                      laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                   7. The application stands allowed.



                                              (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

K.C.Jha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.