Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Fuldeo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to bond and surety conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Fuldeo Yadav, was implicated in a First Information Report alleging that he assaulted an informant with an axe during a petty dispute over cattle trespass, causing a simple injury. He faced charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354, 504 and 506. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the incident was a spontaneous act, involved no repeated blows, and resulted only in a minor injury, and that he has no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail on the basis of the serious nature of the alleged offences. The Court, after considering the facts, the petty nature of the dispute, the lack of repeated assault, and the simple injury, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious IPC charges.
  • Whether the circumstances of a petty dispute, lack of repeated assault, and simple injury justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • IPC
  • simple injury
  • petty dispute
  • bail bond
  • sureties
  • Section 438
  • Section 482
  • BNSS 2023

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90190 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2021 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
                 Fuldeo Yadav Son of Late Shibu Yadav R/o Vill. - Harnsingha, P.O. -
                 Bichkorwa, P.S. - Chakai, Distt. - Jamui.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Prakash Mahto, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148,

                   149, 341, 323, 307, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. The allegation in the First Information Report is

                   that on account of petty dispute with regard to cattle treading in

                   the campus of the petitioner, he abused the informant and upon

                   protest, an act of assault occurred with the petitioner giving an

                   axe blow on the head of the informant leading to injury.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits at the outset

                   that the incident has occurred on a very petty dispute and upon the

                   very fact that the incident happened on the spur of the moment

                   and there is no repetition of blow, Section 307 of the I.P.C.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90190 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      would not get attracted, moreover, in the background of the fact

                      that the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature.

                                   5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for

                      anticipatory bail on the basis of allegations made in the First

                      Information Report.

                                   6.    Taking      into     consideration   the   facts   and

                      circumstances and considering that the incident arose out of a

                      petty dispute coupled with the factum of no repetition of blow

                      and simple injury having been caused, let the above named

                      petitioner, who have no criminal antecedent, be released on bail,

                      in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court

                      below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing

                      bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                      Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in

                      connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 127 of 2021, subject to

                      the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/

                      Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

                      (BNSS), 2023.



                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.