Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjeet RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjeet Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Dighwara P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault, robbery, and causing injury. The prosecution alleged that he ran over the informant's nephew with a tractor lacking a number plate and later participated in a violent raid on the informant's house, looting cash and gold. The petitioner contested the allegations, citing the injury report which, in his view, did not substantiate the charges, and highlighted that other accused had already been granted anticipatory bail and that he has a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail. Considering the lack of criminal antecedent and the evidentiary doubts raised, the court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. and granted anticipatory bail, subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and a four‑week validity period.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the alleged offences
  • Whether the injury report undermines the prosecution's case against the petitioner
  • Whether the court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. to grant anticipatory bail

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • clean antecedent
  • assault
  • robbery
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90274 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran
                 ======================================================

                 Sanjeet Rai S/o Lallan Rai Resident of Basti Jalal Sitalpur, P.S.- Dighwara,
                 District- Saran at Chapra

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s

                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Ajay Kumar Sharma, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Bharat Lal, APP
                 ======================================================

                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                    ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                           2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection

                   with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025 dated 09.02.2025

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 126(2),

                   115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                           3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner while

                   driving the tractor without number plate pushed the Informant

                   and ran over her Nevari. It is further alleged that after sometime,

                   all the accused persons including the petitioner, various armed

                   with lathi, rod and pistol, came at the house of the Informant

                   and assaulted her and also looted cash of Rs. 33,040/- and gold
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90274 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/3




          ornaments.

                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, by taking this Court

          to the injury report, as contained in Annexure-2, submits that the

          injury, which is said to have been caused to the Informant, does

          not support the allegation which is levelled against the

          petitioner, while all other similarly situated persons, against

          whom there is general and omnibus allegations, have been

          extended the privilege of anticipatory bail from the court of

          Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chapra. It is further

          submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.

                  5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant

          of anticipatory bail.

                  6. Regard being had to the submissions made by the

          parties and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, this

          Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                  7. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory

          bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below

          within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional

          Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90274 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                          3/3




                        Dighwara P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to the condition as

                        laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.



                                                      (Ajit Kumar, J)
rishi/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.