Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. MassiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Massi, was arrested on 20-07-2024 in connection with an NDPS case involving the alleged recovery of 800 ml of prohibited cough syrup and 20 strips of Nitrazepam tablets from a sweet shop. He sought bail, claiming false implication and asserting that he would not abscond and would face trial to prove his innocence. The State opposed bail, highlighting that this is the petitioner's second NDPS case and emphasizing the danger of psychotropic substances to the youth. The court considered the seriousness of the offenses, the petitioner's prior criminal history, and the State's arguments. Concluding that the risk of the petitioner influencing the investigation or committing further offenses was significant, the court denied the bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in an NDPS case involving prohibited cough syrup and psychotropic tablets.
  • Whether the petitioner's prior criminal record and the nature of the alleged offenses justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Drugs and Cosmetic Act
  • psychotropic substances
  • criminal procedure
  • pre-trial detention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90570 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2023 Thana- INDUSTRIAL District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Massi S/O Md. Abdul Masjid @ Md. Machcho@ Late Md. Abdul Majid
                 R/O village- Fatehpur Mukeri Tola, P.S.- Bhagalpur Industrial Area, Dist. -
                 Bhagalpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Davendra Kumar Pandey
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Bishweshwar Ram
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-02-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                             2.    The petitioner seeks bail in connection with NDPS

                   Case No. 71 of 2025 arising out of Bhagalpur Industrial Area PS

                   Case NO. 39 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 21(i)(a)/22 NDPS Act and 18(c) and 27 Drugs

                   and Cosmetic Act.

                             3.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is in custody since 20-7-2024 and has antecedent of

                   four cases out of which one case is under the NDPS Act and

                   allegation is of recovery of 800 ml of Drylex-DC prohibited

                   cough syrup along with 20 strips of Nitrazepam-10 tablets from

                   a sweet shop.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90570 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                                 4.     Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                        petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

                        informant. It is next submitted that the sweet shop belongs to

                        Md. Irfan and name of the petitioner during the course of

                        investigation transpired that he along with Md. Irfan are running

                        the shop. It is further submitted that charges have been framed

                        as such petitioner will not abscond rather will face the trial to

                        prove his innocence.

                                 5.     Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes

                        the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that this is the

                        second case of the petitioner under the NDPS Act and allegation

                        is of recovery of cough syrup which contains psychotropic

                        substance along with tablets and of late the young generation is

                        being drawn towards cough syrup and such tablets seeking

                        intoxication.

                                 6.     Considering the submission made by learned APP,

                        the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.



                                                  (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.