Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh kumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Santosh Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma, while the State was represented by Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey. During the hearing, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9067 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Madhepura
                  ======================================================
                  Santosh Kumar Son of Ashok Pd. Yadav @ Ashok Yadav Resident of Village
                  - Rampur, Ward no. 10, Ps- Murliganj, Dist- Madhepura

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma
                  For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    16-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                    argument, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory

                    bail application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.