Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

THAKUR TUDU @ PADUM TUDUversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court held that the criminal miscellaneous case shall be restored to its original file.

Summary

Thakur Tudu and Sunita Devi filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 79329 of 2025, which had been removed from the court's file. The State of Bihar opposed the petition. The petitioners argued that the grounds for restoration were satisfied. The learned counsel for the State could not rebut those grounds. Justice Satyavrat Verma, after hearing both sides, allowed the restoration application, directing that the case be restored to its original file.

Issues considered

  • Whether Criminal Miscellaneous No. 79329 of 2025 may be restored to its original file on the grounds pleaded by the petitioners

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • restoration of case
  • high court
  • petition
  • case management

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90830 of 2025
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79329 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
           1.     THAKUR TUDU @ PADUM TUDU S/O DASO TUDU R/o Vill.- Braham
                  Gyani Kamat, Ward no. 9, P.S.- Bhawanipur, Dist.- Purnea.
           2.     SUNITA DEVI W/O THAKUR TUDU @ PADUM TUDU R/o Vill.-
                  Braham Gyani Kamat, Ward no. 9, P.S.- Bhawanipur, Dist.- Purnea.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Zainul Abedin, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. In view of the grounds taken in the restoration

                   application, the same is allowed, accordingly, Cr. Misc. No.

                   79329 of 2025 is restored to its original file.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.