Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Srikant Rai @ Umakant Rai @ Kallu Rai @ Srikant YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Srikant Rai, was charged under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 330 litres of illicit liquor and two seized motorcycles at a joint family house. He has eight prior criminal cases, five under the excise act, and has been in custody since September 3, 2025. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and his alleged involvement stems only from being the brother of the house owners, making the property a joint family asset. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and his criminal antecedent. The court, after considering the submissions, ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, directing compliance with the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the nature of the offences under IPC and the Bihar Excise Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement can be established given the joint family ownership of the property and lack of conscious possession.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • IPC
  • excise act
  • illegal liquor
  • joint family property
  • criminal antecedent
  • possession of stolen property
  • common intention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90869 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2020 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Srikant Rai @ Umakant Rai @ Kallu Rai @ Srikant Yadav Son of Sanjivan
                 Rai R/o Sukumarpur, P.S. - Raghopur(Rustampur O.P.), P.O. - Jahangirpur,
                 District - Vaishali, and presently R/O Locality - Baglodan Gali (Mangal
                 Talab), P.S. - Chowk, District - Patna.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ravish Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian

                   Penal Code read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedent of eight cases out of which five cases

                   are under the excise act and allegation is of recovery of 330

                   liters of liquor from the house of Ramakant Ray and two

                   motorcycles were seized.

                                4. Learned     counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing

                   was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90869 of 2025(2) dt.30-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      owner of any of the seized vehicles and he came to be

                      implicated based on the fact that he is brother of Ramakant and

                      Jaikant. It is also submitted that the house in question is a joint

                      family property, as such, it cannot be alleged with certainty that

                      it was petitioner who had kept the liquor in the house or the

                      liquor kept in the house was within his knowledge, but since

                      petitioner has criminal antecedent under the excise act, as such,

                      he also came to be implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner

                      is in custody since 03.09.2025.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail

                      application of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                      counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is

                      directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                      10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where

                      the case is pending/successor court in connection with Raghopur

                      (Rustampur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 62 of 2020.



                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.