Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Bablu Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel submitted the request, and the State’s counsel was heard. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Can an anticipatory bail application be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90995 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2025 Thana- JANKINAGAR District- Purnia
                  ======================================================
                  Bablu Kumar S/O Dhaneshwar Yadav R/O Village - Binovagaram Ward No.-
                  9, P.S- Jankinagar, District- Purnea

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Surya Narayan Yadav, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Akbar Ali, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    12-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail application

                    was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly,        the      instant    anticipatory        bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                          (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.