Patna High Court
Appu Patel @ Appu Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court will not extend the surrender time if the petitioner fails to surrender within the period fixed in the anticipatory bail order.
Summary
Appu Patel and Amar Patel, the petitioners, had been granted anticipatory bail with a stipulated time to surrender. They filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender deadline. The State of Bihar opposed the extension. Justice Satyavrat Verma held that the court should not extend the surrender period when the petitioners have not surrendered within the originally prescribed time. Consequently, the modification application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a court can extend the time for surrender under an anticipatory bail order when the petitioner has not surrendered within the stipulated period
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- surrender
- modification application
- Criminal Procedure Code
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9104 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2251 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2024 Thana- BARHARIA District- Siwan
======================================================
1. Appu Patel @ Appu Kumar Prasad S/o- Daulat Ram @ Daulat Prasad @
Daulat Patel Resident Of Village- Sundari, Ps- Barharia, Dist-Siwan
2. Amar Patel @ Amar Kumar S/o- Daulat Ram @ Daulat Prasad @ Daulat
Patel Resident Of Village- Sundari, Ps- Barharia, Dist-Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sobha Devi W/o- Shambhu Gond Resident Of Village- Mathurapur, Ps-
Barharia, Dist-Siwan
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 06-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The Court is taking a consistent view of not
extending the time of surrender, if the petitioners have not
surrendered within the time stipulated in the order by which
they were granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.
3. Accordingly, the modification application is
dismissed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
Checking your session…