Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Guljar AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Guljar Alam, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Roshna P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025) filed under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The co‑accused alleged that the petitioner had sold the pistol involved in an accidental firing. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record. The High Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the bail application, directing the lower court to release the petitioner on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to verification of his antecedent, monthly police attendance, and compliance with Section 482 of the BNSS and Section 438(2) of the CrPC. The order also stipulated cancellation of bail for any default in appearance.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act based on the allegations of the co‑accused.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Arms Act
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • antecedent verification
  • co‑accused statement
  • police attendance

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91045 of 2025
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2025 Thana- Roshna District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Guljar Alam Son of Mansoor Alam Resident of D.S. College, Rasulpur,
                 P.S.- Nagar Katihar, District - Katihar.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr.Md Musowir, Advocate
                 For the State             :        Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Roshna P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025 instituted under Section

                   109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                 3. The name of the petitioner has come in the

                   statement of the co-accused from whose country made pistol

                   accidental firing took place. The petitioner is said to have sold

                   the pistol to the co-accused. The petitioner claims clean

                   antecedent.

                                 4. Considering the aforesaid, this application is

                   allowed.

                                 5. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91045 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     before the Court below within six weeks from today, the

                     petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1 st Class,

                     Katihar, District- Katihar/ concerned Court in connection with

                     Roshna P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid

                     down in Section 482 of the BNSS/ 438(2) of the Code of

                     Criminal Procedure, 1973.

                                  6. At the time of accepting bail bonds of the

                     petitioner, the Court below will verify the criminal antecedent of

                     the petitioner. If it is found that the petitioner has criminal

                     antecedent, the Court below shall not accept the bail bonds of

                     the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner has clean

                     antecedent, his bail bonds shall be accepted by the Court below.

                                  7. The petitioner will also mark attendance in Nagar

                     Katihar Police Station, District-Katihar on the first Sunday of

                     each month. Any default in appearance at the Police Station

                     would result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.


                                                                      (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.