Patna High Court

Ramkrit Kumar @ Ramkrit Yadav @ Ravi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 28 January 2026
Disposal: DISMISSED
Bench: SANDEEP KUMAR

Holding

The court held that anticipatory bail could not be granted and dismissed the application.

Summary

Ramkrit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 61(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He was alleged to have falsely implicated another person by producing illegal arms. The court examined whether the circumstances warranted the grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the seriousness of the allegations and the nature of the offence, the judge was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed.

Issues considered

Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving alleged false implication and illegal arms under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act

Legislation cited

Arms Act — s. 25(1-b)a, 26
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 61(1)

Subjects

anticipatory bail
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Arms Act
false implication
criminal procedure
bail denial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 91058 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-599 Year-2025 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Ramkrit Kumar @ Ramkrit Yadav @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Sonh of Sheoji
                 Yadav Resident of Village - Jagpura, Police Station - Makhdumpur, District -
                 Jehanabad
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr.Uday Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 599 of 2025 instituted under

                   Section 61(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section

                   25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The petitioner is accused of falsely implicating a

                   person in a crime by producing illegal arms.

                                4. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to

                   grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.


                                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar
U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…