Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pankaj JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipation bail was not granted; the application was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Pankaj Jha, sought anticipation bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 137 of 2025) alleging assault and discharge of a firearm, resulting in the victim sustaining fractures and gunshot injuries. The charges were framed under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 35 and 27 of the Arms Act. The High Court examined the seriousness of the offences and the risk of the petitioner evading trial. The Court declined to grant anticipation bail, dismissing the petitioner's application. The petitioner was ordered to surrender within two weeks and to apply for regular bail, with the Superintendent of Police directed to ensure compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipation bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving assault and discharge of a firearm under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipation bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • firearm discharge
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91067 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2025 Thana- DANDARI District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Pankaj Jha S/o Sri Ram Sagar Jha R/o Vill.- Tetari @ Tetri, Ward No. 14, P.s.-
                 Dandari, Dist.- Begusarai, Bihar- 851211

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP
                 For the Informant        :        Mr. Kumar Goutam, Advocate
                                                   Ms. Priyanshu Kumari, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned

                   A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Dandari P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(2) and 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1-B)a, 35 and 27 of

                   the Arms Act.

                                3. The petitioner and other accused persons are said

                   to have assaulted the victim and has also fired at the victim.

                   The victim has sustained fracture as well as gun shot injury.

                                4. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined

                   to grant anticipation bail to the petitioner.

                                5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91067 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. The petitioner is directed to surrender within two

                     weeks from today and prays for regular bail, failing which the

                     Superintendent of Police, Begusarai will take all steps for arrest

                     of the petitioner.

                                  7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                     Superintendent of Police, Begusarai through FAX or e-mail for

                     its compliance.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.