Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Aman Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued for withdrawal, and the court considered whether such withdrawal was permissible. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an applicant can withdraw a pending anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91153 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Aman Kumar Son of Pintu singh @ Amrendra Prasad Singh Resident Of
                  Village -Bathua Bujurg, Ward No 15, Ps- Musarigharari. Distt- Samstipur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    13-01-2026                        1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                       2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                   4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                     (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.